Package Travel

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

German Supreme court decides on tour organiser liabilty for local excursion

The plaintiffs had booked a package holiday to Bulgaria with the defendant. Upon arrival, they recieved a weclome folder which contained a sheet titled "Your Excursions", carrying the defendant's logo and promoting varoius events and excursions. In the bottom line it said that the excursions were organised by a local agency and the defendant would only act as an intermediary. However, the excursions were to be booked through the defendant's local representative. The plaintiffs booked an excursion called "Jeep Safari". On this excursion they suffered a car accident and were injured.

Stephan Keiler's picture

European Parliament adopts new Travel Directive

European Parliament has just adopted the new Travel Directive thereby the legislative procedure is completed!


24+6 months for implementation after publication in the OJ

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20151022IPR98799/html/MEPs-adapt-package-travel-rules-to-the-digital-age

 

* The text of the new Travel Directive can be found here (final version adopted by Council: 9173/3/15 REV 3)

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

IFTTA Law Review 2-2015 online

The latest edition of the IFTTA Law Review is now available online in the members area of the website. It contains an article by Stefan Koch on Ship emmissions and International Maritime Law as well as reports on this year's IFTTA North America Conference and the 8th IFTTA Europe Workshop. Enjoy reading!

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

Austria: Supreme Court decides on tour organizer liability for accident at local excursion

The plaintiff had booked a package to the Dominican Republic with the defandant. Defendant's terms and conditions provided that with regard to third party services (such as local excursions), the defendant was only liable for proper intermediation but not for the proper performance of the services themselves. Defendant's local representative in the Dominican Republic distributed weekly schedules to the guests containing various optional excursions.

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

Germany: two new Supreme Court decisions on air passenger rights

On March 17, 2015 the German Supreme Court (BGH) has passed two judgements with regard to Regulation (EC) 216/2004.

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

German court: tour organizer not entitled to a general cancellation fee of 90 percent of the package price in case of no-show

According to the General Conditions of Contract of a German tour organizer, consumers had to pay a cancellation fee of 90 percent of the full package price if they didn't show up at departure. The cancellation fee applied regardless of the character of the package (air package, round trip, hotel and rental car) with the only exception of cruises to which a cancellation fee of even 100 percent applied.

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

IFTTA Law Review 3-2014 online

The IFTTA Law Review 3-2014 is now available online. It contains the second part of IFTTA's Submission to the UNWTO on the Draft Convention on the Protection of Tourists and Tourism Service Providers and an article by Andras Salamon on "New Interpretation of the Travel Contract in the current Civil Code of Hungary" . The journal can be downloaded from the members area.

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

IFTTA Law Review 1-2014 available online

The latest edition of the IFTTA Law Review is available in the Members' Section of the webiste. It contains an essay by Josep M. Bech Serrat from Girona, providing an overview of the proposal for a new Package Travel Directive.

Michael Wukoschitz's picture

Austrian Supreme Court: tour operator liable for floatplane boarding accident

The plaintiff had booked a package to the Maldives with the defendant. The package included a transfer by floatplane from Malé to the island where the hotel was situated. Accorsing to the Operating Manual of the carrier, it is necessary to moor the floatplane with three ropes. The crew is required to stand at each side of the entrance in order to assist the passengers boarding the aircraft. When the plaintiff was about to board, despite some waves the floatplane was only moored with two ropes and only one member of the crew was standing next to the entrance.

Pages

X